2003 Nissan 350Z Article at Automotive.com

»Locate a Dealer»Find a Used Car»Get Financing

Most Popular: Hybrid Cars|Lexus IS350|Dodge Charger

HOME

2003 Nissan 350Z Road Test Review

Below is an enthusiast article written by the automotive experts at Sport Compact Car. Nissan's new Z car has to be fast. And it has to be cheap. If it isn't, Nissan might as well fold up its tents and head on home. The cheap part is a done deal. We've seen the pricing. This car will start around $27,500.

QUICK PRICE QUOTE

DEALER LOCATOR

User Rating

N/A

Rating:

Value Rating

Poor

LEARN WHY

IntelliChoice Value Rating

The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.

One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.

What is a good car value?

A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.

But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?

For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.

This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)

Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.

Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.

So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.

Change Submodel

CHANGE VEHICLE

Article From Sport Compact Car Magazine

2003 Nissan 350Z

We drive an early prototype and learn Nissan's new Z is on the right track. / By Josh Jacquot / Photography by Josh Jacquot / Article provided by: Sport Compact Car Magazine

Nissan's new Z car has to be fast. And it has to be cheap. If it isn't, Nissan might as well fold up its tents and head on home. The cheap part is a done deal. We've seen the pricing. This car will start around $27,500.

It's the fast part we're worried about. We've driven an early prototype, and honestly, it wasn't that fast. Nissan says this car, which will be called the 350Z when it debuts in August, will be the highest performance Z-car ever. That means a 0-60 mph time of six seconds or less. But the mule we lapped around the road course at Nissan's Tochigi proving ground could not pull this kind of number. True, we left our radar gun back at the office, but our internal clock says Nissan's engineers still have some work to do on the car's VQ35 V6 powerplant--a fact they readily admit.

The car we drove is a very early example with incorrect wheels and front fascia, but it was close enough for us to make a few critical observations about the car's performance.

Standing out most is the steering, as the engine and suspension in the mule will undergo serious changes before production. Steering was well weighted, relatively quick and returned precise feedback through the wheel, allowing the driver to place the car well and focus on the many other facets of driving quickly. Hiroshi Nagaoka, the man in charge of dynamics on the Z and the upcoming Infiniti G35 (which shares the new Z's suspension) attributes the steering feel to the front suspension's two-piece lower control arm. The new design allows for stiffer bushings in the Z's steering rack without compromising NVH or driveability. It also gave designers further flexibility in shaping the new Z's exterior by permitting less front overhang and less distance between the top of the wheelwell and the hoodline.

Critical to the car's performance will be the multi-link forged aluminum suspension bits and rear crossmember, which chassis engineers claim saves about 44 lbs overall. Uncommon on a car in this price range, Nissan has managed to cross-platform the exotic suspension bits with enough other cars so it can amortize development and production costs to give enthusiasts a true performance-car suspension for only slightly more than an economy car price.

Also apparent from the test drive was the car's weight. The new Z will be lighter than the previous-generation Z32, but it's still no featherweight. Many decisions which can affect the car's final curb weight still remain; preliminary estimates have the car at about 3,190 lbs, or about 300 lbs lighter than the Z32 twin turbo. The pork was obvious in the test drive, but it's nothing that can't be cured with some good, old-fashioned horsepower.

The mule we drove made about 250 hp, according to S. Yukawa, chief product specialist on the Z. He promised, in production trim, the VQ will make at least 280 hp. Given the car's current weight, a minimum of 290 hp is necessary if Nissan is to meet its goal of 11 lbs per horsepower. Considering the engine already makes 240 hp in the Altima and 255 hp in the Maxima, finding another 30 to 40 hp isn't an unrealistic expectation. If Nissan manages to squeeze 300 hp from the engine, it'll still only be producing about 85 hp per liter--minimal by Honda standards.

Several changes will be made to bump power in the Z version of the engine. Since the Z's engine is longitudinal, it will receive a new intake manifold. Engineers wouldn't say whether or not the new manifold will be a two-stage design, but it's likely. They admitted the Z engine will get variable cam timing on both the intake and exhaust cams--the Maxima and Altima have this feature only on the intake side. Also likely is a change in the cam spec from that of the Altima and Maxima, but the 6500-rpm redline will remain. Two catalytic converters (one on each side) will be placed immediately after the exhaust manifold collectors in each downpipe.

Nissan has settled on the dual exhaust exits in the rear fascia. Separated by more than a foot, the exhaust tips are an improvement from the center-exit design shown on the car at last year's North American International Auto Show in Detroit. The exhaust note on the mule was a deep sound worthy of the engine's displacement, but the exhaust is yet to be finalized. It's too early to say if the aggressive bellow we heard will make it to production.

Farther down the drivetrain resides Nissan's new six-speed rear-drive transmission or five-speed manually shiftable automatic coupled to a rear-end housing with a viscous limited-slip differential. Traction control and Vehicle Dynamics Control will also be available.

Inside the car, two things stand out. Most significant is the center-mounted tachometer. Why more manufacturers don't do this is beyond us, but it's a feature that makes a vital difference when driving hard. Also interesting is the gauge cluster, which is integrated into the steering column to move as one piece.

Also in the works is a convertible version. Hardcore performance nuts will stick with the hardtop, as removing the roof and adding the necessary bracing to make a convertible rigid often compromises a performance car. It's unclear at this point whether the convertible will debut with the hardtop in August.

Nissan plans to build 5,000 Z cars a month with 2,000 to 3,000 headed to the U.S. market, which is targeted as the volume leader worldwide. There are no plans at this point for a stripper version, but plans for a performance model are being laid out. Details are still sketchy, but several changes have been confirmed. The performance model should get Brembo brakes at all four corners, as well as 18-inch wheels and Michelin 225/45ZR-18 tires in front and 245/45ZR-18 out back. Seventeen-inch wheels are standard. We suspect significant changes to spring rates and shock valving as well, but engineers were reluctant to reveal all the details as of our press time.

One thing's for sure: Delivering $50,000 worth of performance for under $30,000 is the kind of value that made the original Z a huge success. Right now, it's just what Nissan needs.